Home › Guides › Titleist GTS Review

Titleist GTS Driver ReviewGTS2, GTS3 and GTS4 scored on construction and numbers

Updated: Nov 5, 2026Contains affiliate links

I average a score of 72 and play 150 rounds a year. I scored this one seriously.
The GTS scores 3.9 out of 5. When in doubt, the GTS2. If you want to get rid of the miss to the left, the GTS3, whose weights also shift the CG heel to toe. A gear nerd who studies golf equipment cross-checks head material, construction and weight placement against official specs and third-party testing, and writes up the good points and the concerns in numbers. My impressions from hitting it on the range and the course are collected in the “What I learned from hitting it” section.

Bottom line: how I'd choose

Model differences and how to choose

Going GTS2 → GTS3 → GTS4, the higher the number, the easier it is to keep spin and launch down. All three are 460cc, 45.5 inches and the same price, so the choice comes down almost entirely to your current spin rate. By role, the GTS2 is for forgiveness (resistance to mishits), the GTS3 for flight control, and the GTS4 for low-spin distance. The GTS4 has no 11° option, so if you need 11°, choose between the GTS2 and GTS3.

Specs are the makers' official figures. Who each one suits is my own call, made by reading the design from the maker's design approach and numbers, and the views of the publications named in parentheses.

What's new in the design, and what the maker says it does

Scored in six categories

Scores are assigned by this site based on official specs and construction plus the third-party measurements and test reviews listed as sources.

Construction through a gear nerd's eyes

The biggest change is the body. The Full Thermoform body uses a proprietary polymer (resin) that covers about 60% of the surface area at 13% of the head's mass (Titleist official release). The previous GT had resin only on the crown; the GTS wraps 360° all the way to the rear, leaving metal only at the front and back of the head (GDO and ALBA explainers).

Swap metal for resin and you can freely redistribute the saved weight (the US developers say about 30g). The trade-off is that the head resonates differently. As a gear nerd, that's the part I pay attention to. Center hits are fine, but overseas reviewers note a hollow ring on toe and heel strikes. The explanation of the cause is the Golf Monthly writer's guess, but given this construction, it makes sense.

Weights: GTS2 front 11g / back 5g; GTS3 and GTS4 front track 8g / back 5g. Swapping the GTS2's weights front to back changes the measured CG depth from 39.7mm to 42.7mm and MOI from 4,797 to 5,056 (Muneyuki Matsuyoshi, GDO). The maker doesn't publish head weight, total weight or swing weight, so check the built weight at the shop.

How does GTS adjustment work? Loft and lie in 16 combinations, 0.75-degree steps

The GTS is a driver with a wide range of ball-flight adjustment after you buy it. There are three places to adjust.

Source: Titleist Japan official "SureFit Performance Guide". Checked Oct 30, 2026.

The standard position for a right-handed club is "A-1". To raise the ball flight, move up or down the chart; to change how much the club turns over, move left or right. Only the GTS3 and GTS4 let you move the center of gravity left and right. That CG track is why I suggest the GTS3 to anyone who wants to get rid of the miss to the left.

Make your adjustments before the round. Changing settings during a round is not allowed under the rules.

Can I use shafts from earlier Titleist drivers? Compatible with nine generations

Yes. Sleeve-equipped shafts from the GT, TSR, TSi, TS, 917, 915, 913 and 910 fit the GTS driver. If you have a shaft that works for you in a TSR2 or GT2, you can swap in just the GTS head and compare. With a GTS where the shaft alone changes the price by JPY 22,000, this compatibility matters.

What I learned from hitting it: the sound of misses and how the weights move

This section is about the GTS2 and GTS3, which I used. I tried them on an indoor TrackMan and for one round (14 holes) with clubs, and I write down what I felt. I haven't tried the GTS4 or other shaft combinations. Those parts rest on official numbers and third-party measurements.

The claim that initial speed and spin stay consistent even off-center felt about right when I hit them. Ball flight differs by player. Think of it this way: if you tend to miss right, you miss right less, and if you tend to miss left, you miss left less. The yardage I measured is in the next section.

I could also tell by ear that the sound gets harder when you miss the center. Hit on the center, it's low and compact. Off the heel or toe, a slightly harder, higher sound comes back. Compared with the driver I used before, the change in sound is clear, and I felt it was easy to notice a miss.

Something other articles don't say. When I changed the weight position, the ball height and the left-right lean changed in a straightforward way. The loft sleeve setting works in combination with the shaft, so I'd start without moving it from standard and try one thing at a time.

What I can't praise: the hard sound when you miss the center, and the high price. For people who like a soft feel, it may come down to taste.

Numbers I hit: the GTS2 carried 5 yards less than the QUANTUM, but was 2 yards tighter

In October I hit the GTS2 20 times and the GTS3 10 times indoors. I also played one round (14 holes) with clubs.

I hit them on Saturday, Oct 17, 2026, at around 11 a.m. It was an indoor range, alone, in 1 session of about 1 and a half hours. I used Pro V1 balls and a TrackMan launch monitor.

The order was 10 shots with the QUANTUM, then 20 with the GTS2, then 10 with the GTS3 last, hit in blocks rather than alternating. Those first 10 QUANTUM shots were my warm-up, and the QUANTUM figures in the table below are the average of those 10.

Clubhead speed 46 m/s. The GTS2 had a ball speed of 67.5 m/s and 2,700 rpm of spin.

The 10 GTS3 shots gave 244 yards of carry, 2,500 rpm of spin and ±15 yards side to side. That's 2 yards shorter in carry than the GTS2 and 200 rpm less spin. By the last 10 shots I felt a little tired.

GDO's test says it goes right at a 40 m/s head speed. At 46 m/s, I sent only a few shots right.

On the GTS3, moving the weight toward the heel cut my right misses by 10 yards. Moving it back didn't change the curve. The screw also worked loose until I re-tightened it firmly with the supplied wrench.

On center the sound was low and compact. Toward the toe it was a high, hard "tick," and toward the heel a slightly dull, hard sound. The QUANTUM sounded a little rounder, and the G440 K was similar.

The stock shaft was light, in the 50-gram range, and I swung too fast. With the VENTUS TR RED 6S swapped in, my left-right spread got smaller and the carry went up 3 yards. Changing only the shaft settled the ball flight.

On the course, I used a GTS2 on Wednesday, October 21, at a flat course in the Kanto area. It was a cloudy 17°C, and I played with two friends. I found the fairway with my tee shot on 8 of 14 holes. The last 4 holes ended at sunset.

Of the 16 loft and lie settings, one step of loft changed launch by about 1°. Changing the lie moved the ball only a few yards left or right. Try the standard setting first and move one thing at a time.

When you demo one, check the sound on off-center hits and how much the curve changes when you move the weight. What I can't praise is the sound of a miss, which is hard and metallic. If you find adjusting the weight a chore, the GTS3 takes some effort.

Start from standard and move the loft one step at a time, and you won't get lost in all 16 settings. You can find the position that fits your ball flight.

My call:I don't plan to buy one. Against the QUANTUM, the gap is 5 yards of carry and about 100 rpm of spin. I judged that to be too little for the price. For players whose strike point wanders, the GTS2 suits them because its ball speed stays consistent.

Cons

What still earns credit

GDO's testing and overseas magazines agree that ball speed and spin stay stable on off-center strikes. GDO user ratings are 4.5 for both the GTS2 (28 reviews) and GTS3 (11 reviews). The GTS4 was praised for "overturning the idea that LS models are hard" (Nishikawa) and as "the easiest in the series to set up to" (Taniguchi). For players with some swing speed who want a smaller gap between good and bad strikes, the build is worth the price.

Numbers vs. the previous model and rivals

Sources: Titleist official release; measurements by Muneyuki Matsuyoshi, GDO.

GTS2, GTS3 or GTS4: which suits you?

Titleist doesn't give swing-speed guidance. In test reviews, the GTS3 is described as for 40 m/s and up, and the GTS4 for players who can launch the ball themselves. Switching makes the biggest difference if your strike wanders and your distances vary. If you usually find the center, the GTS3's weights let you enjoy fine-tuning your ball flight. I compare the three in GTS drivers compared.

About the writer and sources

I play about 150 rounds a year and average a 72. I read the official specs with an eye on which numbers matter on the course.

What I say about clubs I've used covers only what I actually used. Everything else is a comparison of official numbers. Last updated Nov 5, 2026.

FAQ

Related reading

Titleist GTS Drivers Compared
How to choose between the GTS2, GTS3 and GTS4.

2026 Driver Reviews Roundup
Scores for 8 models on one page.

Sources for this article

• Titleist official release
• Titleist official: GTS2
• GDO: measurements by Muneyuki Matsuyoshi
• GDO new product report: GTS2
• GDO new product report: GTS3
• GDO late-night test: GTS2
• GDO Gear Catalog: GTS2
• ALBA measurements
• Golf Monthly GTS2
• Golf Monthly GTS4
• Kakaku.com: GTS

Last updated: Sep 14, 2026

Specs and prices are the figures published on manufacturers' official websites and in press releases, and by media outlets (checked Sep 14, 2026). These are published figures; any numbers from my own hitting or use are given in the article body with their conditions.